August
Baron von Berlepsch (1815-1877) One
of the Great Apiarist Personalities of the 19th Century, The
following text is an extract - introduction from his work published
(3rd edition 1873). The technical
part would go beyond the scope of a homepage. The book may be borrowed
from well-assorted public libraries. The
Hoey Bee and its Breeding in Movable Honeycombs Plus
habet operas quam ostentationis (Quint. 1.4.5.)
My
Life as an Apiarist 1.
The beginning of my passion for bees dates back to the early days of childhood, and the only thing I still remember is that when I was a very
little boy, I liked nothing better than running away from my
nurse to the bees of our neighbour Gottlob Richter. When the lovely
maiden came to take me back, I was standing right amidst the buzzing
bees, crying mockingly: “try and get me, try and get me!” On 2.
My grandfather who was still alive at that time, Baron Gottlob von
Berlepsch, was a grammar school and university fellow student of Döring
and insisted on presenting me to his former pal. It happened that Döring
was as enthusiastic beekeeper as a philologist, and when grandfather
told him that “bees meant everything to his little grandson and that
he was very skilled in handling them,” the amiable 72 year old man
insisted on my bees being moved to 3.
As a student of philology and law at the universities of
4.
From 1836 to 1838 I worked as a post-graduate judicial service trainee
at the regional and local court of Mühlhausen in Thuringia
while I owned a
small beehouse in said place and a larger one at my father’s estate
nearby. Soon I became absolutely fed up with juridical practice because
of its dull formalism; I quitted and went to the ‘German Athens’,
the splendid city of Munich. Living at
Theresienstrasse, I let the bees fly out from the bedroom windows.
But when despite all my attentiveness, a hive was swarming in June 1840
and the swarm moved to Ludwigstrasse landing on a
hackney cab, the police ordered me under penalty of punishment to
remove my hives at once. 5.
My father died on 6.
So the year 1845 began when Dzierzon made his first appearance in public
and the bee journal
(i.e.
(Nördlinger) Eichstädter Bienen-Zeitung, which is the first
substantial beekeepers’ journal in the world edited from 1845 to 1899)
was founded by Barth and Schmid. 7.
In 1845, when Dzierzon appeared and the bee journal was published for
the first time, I probably was the one who had made the most experiments
among all living beekeepers, but I had neither come to know the
hive with movable honeycombs and I am lacking Dzierzon’s immense
astuteness and amazing talent for observation. Motivated by this new
incentive, I doubled the efforts which I spent on observations and tests,
mainly to verify Dzierzon’s theorems in all directions. But
regrettably enough, I was so unfortunate as to own such miserable hives
with movable honeycombs that my work was often delayed, hindered or
totally frustrated, but yet so fortunate to recruit a 15 year old boy,
Wilhelm Günther, the youngest son of my gardener, in 1848 as my
assistant who was in no way inferior to Huber’s famous assistant
Burnens in terms of inquisitiveness, perseverance, talent for
observation, and astuteness. He has been by my side with great loyalty
in all matters, and I feel obliged to express my thanks to him in public,
as I did in the 1st edition, now also in the 2nd edition.
Without him, a good many things in that work would certainly not
be as they are. 8.
Finally, after seven years of silent studiousness, I came before the
public in the bee journal in the issues of the years 1853 and 1854 with
my Apiarian Letters which should become so famous and in which I, now
standing on firm ground, presented Dzierzon’s fundamental theses in
systematic sequence and in astute and clear form, furnishing
experimental evidence on all points. As if on military command, a
triumph was achieved for Dzierzon’s new theory. Many agreed openly,
others at least kept quiet, whereas Dzierzon himself had in vain been
struggling for recognition of his theory since 1845 in numerous articles
in the bee journal and in special publications. 9.
The first to swear the oath of allegiance with Dzierzon was Kleine. In
the 1854 bee journal, page 4, he wrote: “Von
Berlepsch has published a series of apiarian letters in the bee journal
which must be welcomed as an event of greatest importance by all those
of its readers who take a higher interest also in the scientific aspect
of beekeeping. A new system which poured an unexpected light over the
secret obscurity of apian life was established and struggled for
recognition. Although it may
have found such recognition in many places, this yet happened in
the quiet. No one supported it openly and frankly. So many prejudices
had to be overcome, the
choruses of apiarian scientists rose up against it so uncompromisingly,
and the deeper insight into natural science among beekeepers was such a
pia vis (lit. pious force)
that it needed the firm confidence of conviction, the skilled tactics
and the resolute courage of Dzierzon to fight his case in a seven years’
struggle, however, with successful result. Nevertheless, the truth of
what he claimed was still only based on his own testimony credence to
which was not given from all sides, and his scientifically founded
principles were granted only the significance of hypotheses. At that
moment, von Berlepsch, with his unsuspicious testimony, sided with the
single-handed fighter. As a second Oedipus, he resolutely went into
action against fatal Sphinx, solved its most intricate riddles with
admirable astuteness, taking from us the ultimate doubt which we might
have had against the new teachings.” 10.
Already before my presentation in the bee journal, the famous
Carl Theodor Ernst von Siebold, Professor
for zoology and comparative anatomy
in Breslau (Wroclaw), at that time stationed in
Munich, had contacted Dzierzon in 1851, “partly” as he wrote to me
later, “to get instructed himself about the life of bees by the
greatest authority on bees nowadays, partly to come to the beekeeper’s assistance with his
microscope and exact science.” Also,
von Siebold had condescended to take the chair of vice-president at the
3rd migratory meeting of German Beekeepers in Brieg in 1855.
This encouraged me to send quite a lengthy letter to von Siebold in
which I proved the only
still hypothetic point in Dzierzon’s theory, the reproduction of the
male bee through parthenogenesis, by empirical arguments, while loudly
calling for the help of von Siebold and all natural scientists. My voice
should no longer be crying in the wilderness. For already in May 1855,
the no less famous Professor Leuckart from Gießen came with his big
microscope to visit me in Seebach and so did Siebold in August the same
year. And the latter was successful in supplying the
scientific-microscopic evidence proving the correctness of Dzierzon’s
hypothesis in my garden salon and thus shaking the foundations of the
whole theory of procreation.
More details are contained in Chapter VIII of the book. 11.
In the years 1852 and 1853, I had considerably perfected the movable
hive with movable honeycombs by the appropriate construction of the bee
pavilions and by inventing the frames, thus having prepared a beehouse of
more than 100 beehives with movable honeycombs of the type that may
probably have been seen in larger size, but definitely not better
populated and with better internal structures. In this context, I will
only quote what von Siebold has written in the Parthenogenesis, p. 110:
“I was really astonished at the bee material which was presented to me
in Seebach; the mass of bee colonies as well as the utterly suitable
equipment which was most appropriate for observations of any kind,
surpassed all my expectations. I found 104 Dzierzon hives intended for
hibernating and packed with honey and bees, distributed in different
forms over a spacious orchard in 8 places, from which the pavilion with
its 28 colonies, which had often been discussed in the bee journal, was
a particular surprise to me.” Crowds of beekeepers from all over
Europe,
even Russia, France, Sweden
and 12.
Theory and practice were developed in the bee journal with more and more
thoroughness, and a continually growing number of excellent men bought
the journal, let me only mention Dönhoff, Vogel and Count Stosch in
that period. 13.
Despite all my involvement with bees and science, especially with
national economy and the other social doctrines that are governing the
world of today, I got so sick of living in a small village deprived of
any scientific communication, that I left my large bee establishment to
Günther and moved to Gotha
in 1858. In
cooperation with my old friend Kalb, I built up a new beehouse which almost
reached up to the one in Seebach, continued my research work untiringly
and became aware that eventually the time had come to collect all the
material published in the bee journal and otherwise existing in bits and
pieces, and combine it to a comprehensive didactic book.
August Baron von Berlepsch married on 8 Januar 1867 the renowned widowed author Karoline (Lina) Künstle, nèe Welebil, and died 17.9.1877 in Munich. Statement for all links in this homepage: In accordance with decision of 12.May 1998 - 312 OS 85/98 - "liability for links" by the Regional Court (LG) Hamburg we hereby expressly explain that we have no influence on the contents of linked pages outside this homepage, for whose contents we cannot be liable and that we dissociate from contents of linked sites that are against valid laws. |
||||
|
|
|||